To Cold Read or Not to Cold Read

Labrug | 17/05/2006 - 13:42

I have been reading the forum on Audition Tips and one subject that has come up that is of particular interest to me is the issue of Cold Reading. Quite obviously you either don’t like them or don’t mind them, and there have been quite convincing comments made for both sides, and I exclude any comment already made by myself in this regard.

It is also very timely considering the impending auditions for Quake 2006  at the Garrick Theatre, Perth. Link here for more http://www.theatre.asn.au/forum_topic/auditions_for_garrick_one_act_season The question then becomes do I Cold Read or not? I know that Cold Reading doesn’t demonstrate the ability to show character development and acting skills. This is something that comes only from rehearsals. For this reason I am requesting applicants to prepare a short (30 sec to 2 min) monologue which will be presented first.

The thought was to then hold ‘Cold Readings’ of the play to try and determine ensemble dynamics; how the actors worked within a team and without much preparation.

Now, I do believe that there may be some vagueness surrounding what a Cold Reading actually is, and maybe that’s where my confusion rests Puzzled. The extreme version of a ‘Cold Reading’ is that the actors have very little (if any) preparation before they are to read on-stage. This approach I do have a problem with. This would be great for testing the ability to improvise and invent, but not necessarily an accurate measure of acting ability. Despite the general fear Barf! that can well in the heart of newbies, this approach can, and often is, very off-putting to many actors. It is an unfair evaluative method.

My perception was in the fact that the actors would be working with others with minimal, but some, experience of either the script or each other. Industrious actors would no doubt have attempted to find a copy of the script (if available) and read up on it, or found some reviews of previous productions, and possibly even source sample pages from the Director. This would give them a familiarity with the story, script, etc without actually knowing what was to be read specifically at the audition. Plus the Director will most likely want to try various combinations and there is certainly no way to prepare for that.

Idea Maybe this could be called a ‘Luke-warm Reading’ or a ‘Medium Rare Reading’.

Jokes aside, attempting to give the actor a chance to demonstrate their skills and still be able to experiment with group combinations means (as far as I can see) an Audition in two stages; Individual and Group.

The individual can have something they prepared earlier. The group would have no opportunity at all for preparation.

Your thoughts and opinions are most welcome and may influence my options for the Auditions of 'Quake'

Jeff Watkins

http://au.geocities.com/labrug

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
I understand your problem
Author: Logos
Date: 17/05/2006 - 18:57
Logos's picture

I was a bit flippant in the last post I put on the Audition tips thread but I'll try and be a bit more serious. I do look at, in fact ask for, prepared pieces particularly from performers I do not know. I do cold readings at most of my auditions. (The relevant excerpts from the script are given to the actor at the call time if I have appointment times but I don't see them for 15 minutes.) I use the cold reading to watch an actors approach to a script. How do they read, can they pick up cues from the text as to basic characterisation, how do they respond to others etc. If a performer advises me that they have a specific reading disability I make other arrangements.
I realise this can be a threatening approach for some performers but this is not a comfortable industry to work in. If you aren't prepared occasionally to go out on a limb should you be here?


Sorry didn't finish
Author: Logos
Date: 17/05/2006 - 19:00
Logos's picture

In the end Jeff you have to make up your own mind. What is going to acheive the result you want. I really do wish you luck and I envy you a bit. I'd probably like to be doing my first show all over again. The excitiement is never really as good as the first time.
Tony Moore


Thanks
Author: Labrug
Date: 18/05/2006 - 08:40
Labrug's picture

For the warm wishes. Yes, it will be my descision as to what approach I shall use, and currently I am quite happy to follow through with the Short Monologue with Group 'Luke Warm' Readings. However, as I am only doing this for the first time, I do not want to close myself off to any and all opinions on the matter. I think that being able to pick through the (hopeful) list of options, I should be able to put together a structured and actor-friendly audition process.

Dixi

Jeff Watkins
Perth based Actor/Performer
Fight/Sword Choreographer

http://au.geocities.com/labrug


Hi Jeff, The most common
Author: Walter Plinge (not verified)
Date: 19/05/2006 - 15:30

Hi Jeff,
The most common method used in amateur theatre seems to be either to have a reading about a week earlier for those who are keen and interested, and then conduct the audition by choosing chosen pieces of the script in groups.
You can do the audition as an open or as a closed audition. Open auditions are more fun for the auditionees because they are not sitting around waiting with nothing to do for ages.
The othe common way to do the auditions if you are not doing a reading prior, is to have all the actors together and give everyone a chance at reading the same audition pieces in front of each other. Although this may give the later actors a slight advantage as they have processed other performances and work out how they will approach the role, you can always give the "starting group" another go after if they wish.
The idea of doing a monologue (no matter how short)in an audition for an amateur theatre one acter is certainly very intimidating and will put some of your potential actors off (Especially older ones who do not have monologue prepared that they can just rattle off!) This in turn may reduce your pool of potential actors for the roles.
My personal preference is just to do an open audition and read in front of the other actors.
Hope this helps.
Chris


The trend exists
Author: Labrug
Date: 22/05/2006 - 15:16
Labrug's picture

Yes Chris. You are right. Most smaller companies hold preliminary readings for productions and I have attended a few myself. Most of the time I tend to skip the reading however and just go straight to the Audition. Your thoughts also mirror that of Tulipa.

I guess I have my 'people-pleasing' cracks showing as I have allowed Monologues for those who wish it. It is optional after all. In the end, I will have to do some group readings as I need to determine ensemble dynamics and I have only one afternoon to do it in! Ouch. With more time, I think I may have considered the pre-reading approach.

The monologue, while intimidating for some, may also be attractive to others who like to feel that they are 'Prepared' so-to-speak. There is an opinion that Monologues allow actors to demonstrate their ability to develop and perform a rehearsed piece. Many actors develop a veritable catalogue of parts that they can produce at will. It would be sad to exclude these possible also.

I guess I'll be trying for a flexible audition process that allows the actor to express their individual style and preferences. Minimal discrimination.

Thank you Crhis for your comments.

Dixi

Jeff Watkins
Perth based Actor/Performer
Fight/Sword Choreographer

http://au.geocities.com/labrug


Auditions.
Author: Tulipa (not verified)
Date: 22/05/2006 - 13:59

Jeff,

I am an actor, with professional training and credits, and as stupid as this sounds, I enjoy doing auditions. Why? Years ago I came to the understanding that auditions are to the actor what quotes are to the builder - an essential part of the trade. Sometimes people will go with your quote and other times they won't.

Auditions can be a vulnerable process for actors because as humans we innately fear rejections and if the job carries money then the stakes seem higher.

In my opinion the method of auditioning is a personal preference on the part of the director and in response to his/her perceived 'vision' of the play. It's about what you are looking for. My personal preference, as an actor auditioning, is to do improvisation (group, duo or solo)over simply reading a text or 'preparing a piece'. Why impro? Cos it's fun. You get to look another actor in the eye, say words, move around, use your instincts and create.

Auditions are like the boogey man in the cupboard at home. If you allow them to stay shrouded in mystery and only tackle the beast when you are forced to, then fear will always sabbotage the process, for both actor and director. I do lots of auditions - often for things that I know I have no real chance in and no burning passion for. I treat each audition as a fun performance opportunity. I meet the people involved, chat to other actors and 'take chances'. I am often offered call backs for all sorts of stuff. Yes, I have mucked up some auditions spectacularly. I am no expert.

We actors are strange creatures. We cling to text and firm direction as guide rails to get us from one point to another. Pre reading the text and stressing over getting a monologue right to impress a director are all part of this. Despite this panic to be organised what we actors really love, and crave, is the chance to 'play'. Trust me. At the next audition you conduct toss away the scripts, get your actors looking at each other, suggest a topic, put on some silly music and let 'em go. Watch, as before you, nervous, stiff, tentative bodies show you the qualities that you are really seeking for your play. And remember, 80% of what we perceive from the world around us is visual. Great speeches and eloquent monologues are one thing, but interesting, committed and compelling physical acting is quite something else.

Happy playing - they are called PLAYS for a reason!


Thank you indeed
Author: Labrug
Date: 22/05/2006 - 14:25
Labrug's picture

This is indeed an interesting perspective on auditions. I shall take your words in very closely. While they may not be appropriate for the rather short deadline I will have with this One Act Play, I will certainly consider this approach for any full-length play I will attempt in future.

Allowing a bit of free-form I think will certainly have it's place and may even be a great introduction into the rehearsal process also. In fact, I think I may apply this to rehearsals, at least in the early stages.

Thank you Tulipa. You advice is well received and extremely useful.

Dixi

Jeff Watkins
Perth based Actor/Performer
Fight/Sword Choreographer

http://au.geocities.com/labrug


In fear of rattling a cage
Author: Logos
Date: 18/07/2006 - 15:50
Logos's picture

I have recently been involved in a production where the director cast from a series or prepared pieces only. No workshop or cold reading. After about two weeks rehearsal he felt the need to "sack" and actor who was apparently able to present a stunning reading of a monolgue but is apparently unable to learn lines and movements together or take any direction.
A possible pitfall.

Life's too short to stuff a mushroom
www.tonymoore.id.au


Interesting dilemma
Author: Labrug
Date: 18/07/2006 - 16:05
Labrug's picture

Very curious example Logos. Sounds a bit like someone I know - Gift of the gab but no gumption when it comes to task.

I believe that all audition methods are open to 'abuse' if you are skilled in the appropriate way. One reason FOR cold reading I guess, test the 'On-My-Feet' skills.

After my rather short experience with Quake as a director and my extensive experience as an actor being auditioned, my personal feeling is a shade of grey approach. Prepare the possible auditionees for cold readings by providing synopsis, outline, whatever, and provide the option to perform a monologue piece.

My thoughts - The more options you can provide as a director, the wider your field of choice.

Dixi

Jeff Watkins
Perth based Actor/Performer
Fight/Sword Choreographer

http://au.geocities.com/labrug


 18/07/2006 - 15:50 Logos Life's too short to stuff a
User login

Who's online
There are currently 1 user and 357 guests online.Online users:

  • Freddie Badgery

Navigation

Syndicate
XML feed

Featured event
Casula Powerhouse Theatre (Sydney) presents
Inside Out